|
I was surfing the net one day last week and came across an interesting article by Mr. Abdoulaye W. Dukulé, posted on the Perspective Web site. I found Mr. Dukule’s argument intriguing and think it worth the attention of all Liberians who care deeply about the sociological composition of the new Liberia that is in the making. I commend him for standing up for his principles by resigning from an organization dominated by Christian practices or rites. No Liberian should compromise his or her principles just to fit into the general population where Christianity seems to influence every thought and action. Although I am in complete agreement with Dukule’s idea of “religious diversity and tolerance,” I think most of his argument about the influence of “Christianity” in Liberian society is way off the mark.
The dominance of Christianity in Liberian politics
and society is not an accident; but a “design.”
I am one who appreciates this dominance of Christian
religiosity as opposed to Islamic dominance. However,
in the same breath, I must confess that I am a devout
“secularist” who thinks that rationalism
is the key to the improvement of the human condition
here and now. Of the two religions, Christianity and
Islam, Christianity seems to have better link to rationalist
theory than does Islam. Heretofore, Christianity,
as the source of power and political influences in
Liberia, was a “good” thing. Here is why:
To understand how a minority religion, Christianity,
became the source of power and influence in Liberia,
one has to deconstruct the historical contextual premise
that gives rise to the formation of Liberia in the
early part of the 19th century. In brief, the birth
of modern Liberia is an outgrowth of an American domestic
problem---slavery. The purposes for which Liberia
was founded in 1822 are many; but the two most compelling
are: 1. to establish a beachhead on the African continent
from whence the spread of Christianity and “civilization”
could take over native African culture;. and 2. for
fear of a slave uprising, modern Liberia became a
place far from North America where free slaves would
be exported and forgotten about.
Although the role of religion was influential---the
Christianization of the native Africans in Liberia
did not succeed as was intended by the religious members
of the American Colonization Society (ACS). However,
the influence of Christian religiosity on Liberian
society did become a power to reckon with by the mid-20th
century. The influence of Christianity took centre
stage in Liberian society, as opposed to Islam, because
early education of the seacoast natives was predominantly
through the protestant churches and later the Catholic
churches. Christianity was slow in moving to the heartland
of Liberia. As a result, the hinterland inhabitants
were left to the dominance of their “Pro Society”
and to some degree Islam. However, by the mid 1950s,
the Methodists and the Lutherans did make a substantial
inroad to the heartland. Although Islam was present
in what is now modern Liberia before the arrival of
Christianity, it failed to take root in Liberia as
it did in other African countries such as Guinea and
the Ivory Coast, Liberia’s next door neighbors.
The people of the Islamic faith were more interested
in trade than conversion of the hinterland to Islam.
I am for the influence of Christianity as the dominant
religion in Liberia, as opposed to Islam and other
religions. I am not a student of Islamic history,
but my layman understanding of Islamic teachings in
today’s world sometimes runs a chill down my
spine. This is because Islam is a religion that seems
not to provide an opportunity for debate. Its rigidity
to evolving human conditions seems to make it arcane
in this age of human “civilization.” There
are two examples I would like to mention in this article:
the status of women in most Islamic society and the
fate of intellectuals who dare to interpret the Koran.
Take for example the idea of honor killing in the
name of family honor, which is barbaric and inhumane.
Yet Pakistan and some North African countries condone
such an act. The best example for the fate of Islamic
intellectuals who dare to critique the Koran is Salman
Rushdie, the author of The Satanic Verses, who was
sentenced to death by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini,
the father of The Islamic Republic of Iran. With respect
to Christianity, it has one of the worst historical
records of barbaric acts. However, its doctrine is
open to debate and continues to evolve to meet the
demands of today’s society. For example; Martin
Luther’s 95 Theses opened the door directly
between the common man and God. The doctrine of Liberation
Theology in Latin America in the 1980s forced the
Catholic Church and protestant religions to pay attention
to the condition of man on earth as opposed to only
preparing his soul for “Heaven.”
The flexibility and tolerance of Christianity for open debate of its doctrine in society has been a powerful source of human development and “civilization” since the 1500s. As I stated above, I am a devout secularist and not a fundamentalist or devout Christian. But I am a strong believer of the Protestant ethic and the moral teaching of Christianity. With this view, the dominance of Christian religion in Liberian society must be preserved at all cost. Until the draconian doctrine of Islam is moderated or opened to debate, its station in Liberian society must be marginalized, but protected by the constitution. I do not wish to see my daughter or any woman in Liberian society be a second class citizen and especially a victim of “honor killing,” no matter what their action might be. Moreover, I do not wish to see Liberian intellectuals subjected to threats of violence by an Imam, just for the free exercise of his intellectual freedom on any subject, especially religion.
Although some of us would like to see Islam contained as a minority religion, it has the potential to become the dominant religion in Liberia at any time. This is possible because Islam has a better attitude toward the “poor” and poverty and provides better social services than does Christianity. Islam looks at the condition of the “poor” as a societal issue, whereas Christianity looks at it as individual problem. In a country such as Liberia, where the poor have outnumbered the rich 20-to-1, as a result of 15 years of chaos, the prospect for Islamicization of society is very strong. To maintain Christianity as the dominant power and influence in Liberia society, the Liberian Christian community has to do a better job in attending the needs of the poor, fighting against the systemic corrupt practices in government, condemning ritual killings, and above all fighting for economic and social justice for all. Failure to appropriately address these social ills will result in Islam filling the void and Christianity becoming the marginalized religion.
Mr. Dukule’s article has brought to the forefront the question of religion and its role in Liberian society. This provides a forum for earnest debate on the question of religion as we undertake the arduous task to rebuild and redefine Liberian society for the next quarter century and beyond. The role of religion as the moral compass of our society is paramount. The question as to which religion (Christianity or Islam) will dominate has to be answered and I think the debate has begun, thanks to Mr. Dukulé.