Reorganizing the Liberian Military for External Defense & Internal Peacekeeping
(A Speech Delivered at the African Methodist
Episcopal University, Monrovia, Liberia,
March 2005)
By Syrulwa Somah, PhD
The Perspective
Atlanta, Georgia
April 7, 2005
I am humbled by the opportunity to address the faculty, staff, and student body of this great institution. My organization, the Liberian History, Education, and Development, Inc. (LIHEDE) has prepared a proposed curriculum for a Liberian studies program at every higher institution of learning in Liberia. I plan to present a copy of the proposed curriculum to your president for consideration by your university.
In the meantime, members of my delegation and I are grateful to God for giving us the opportunity to visit the land of our birth. We are very happy to be in Liberia at this historic time. Our trip was slightly delayed due to airline problems, but we are glad we could be here to share a few words with all of you - my sisters and brothers. Of course, the moment the news broke that I would be traveling to Liberia with Liberian native and U.S. Army Reserve Lieutenant Jonah Tarley to conduct a workshop on reorganization of the Liberian military, many persons got the wrong impression that I was stepping outside the area of my professional training. I received written and verbal concerns from some of you, and I appreciate your concerns. But I want to assure you that in everything I do, I usually try to understand the politics of the day so as to guide my steps in my endeavor to contribute to the redevelopment of Liberia. My goal in discussing the reorganization of the Liberian military is not to present myself as an expert on the Liberian military, nor do I aspire to be a military expert on Liberia in the future. I harbor a desire, nevertheless, to share my views with all of you, just as I have done in the past with topics on malaria, the environment, Liberian studies, and electoral divisions.
I believe one of the key issues at the heart of future
peace and stability in Liberia is the composition
of the Liberian military. The military in any country
is the first line of defense against external aggressions
and internal disturbances. But once the military is
promoted or demoted (your choice) to the status of
“warring faction,” as occurred with the
Armed Forces of Liberia during the 1989-2003 civil
wars in Liberia, then the need to reorganize the military
becomes very important in winning back lost public
trust and respect. In this context, I believe that
in order for the Liberian military to ever regain
the trust and confidence of the Liberian people, it
would have to be reorganized to reflect an ethnic
balance, a professional code of ethics, and a professional
public standing in society. I will now invite you
to reason with me as together we discuss the history
of the Liberian military, its purposes, its goals,
and its future viability.
Many of you can remember that prior to 1980, the Liberian
military was the least regarded public institution
in Liberia. Many persons (Liberians and outsiders)
saw the Liberian military not as a viable public institution
for providing external security and internal stability,
but as an institution deserving only of the least
educated and less ambitions people amongst us. But
the events of 1980 showed that the Liberian military
did have people with great ambitions - persons with
personal, political, educational, and cultural ambitions
- than we had all imagined. The coup of 1980 therefore
transformed the Liberian military into the new powerbrokers
in Liberia, while career Liberian politicians rushed
back to the drawing board to see what went wrong.
And, by way of political miscalculations, our nation
and people were consumed by 14 years of two brutal
civil wars without any clear winners. However, the
Liberian military is yet to recover from its strained
relations and poor image with the Liberian people
for what it did or did not do during the civil wars.
During the war years between 1989 and 2003, government
leaders expected the Liberian military to fight with
all its might to crush the invading forces, while
the commanders of the invading forces expected the
Liberian military to sit back and watch the power-play.
And because the Liberian military was not confronting
external forces but Liberians fighting among themselves
for political power, the command and control structure
of the Liberian military disintegrated and individual
interests took hold over national interest. The loss
of command and control in the Liberian military prolonged
the civil wars. As a result, the Liberian nation today
lies in total ruins, while the Liberian people now
live on handouts from international relief agencies
and friends and relatives from abroad.
However, as we prepare to elect new national leaders
in October 2005, in the hope of restoring normal life
to all Liberians, we need to concentrate our efforts
on maintaining internal stability. And the only public
institution (to some extent the national immigration,
security, and police services) charged with maintaining
internal stability and protecting all Liberians against
external security threats is the Liberian military.
Never mind if the civil wars occurred from within
or without because there are always two kinds of operative
forces at play in any war situation. One operative
force is characterized by patriotism, love, justice,
harmony, and the well being of all citizens. The other
operative force is characterized by parasitism and
works like predatory ants with the instinct to attack
and kill everything in its path. This second operative
force is also myopic, visionless, and narrow minded,
and loyal only to greed and the selfish exploitation
of others.
In other words, the civil wars in Liberia were brutal
in shape and yielded no positive benefits to the Liberian
people. We need to pick up the pieces after the civil
wars and start the rebuilding of our country. Perhaps,
the senseless nature of the civil wars gave us practical
reasons why our forefathers could never welcome violence
and warfare as a possible solution to political and
economic problems. Therefore, regardless of the magnitude
of provocation, regardless of the general public provocation,
and regardless of individual hatred, our ancestors
saw war as an unwise approach to settling our differences
and dissatisfactions. Hence, the slaughtering of our
oral historians, musicians, academicians, politicians,
civilians, and military leaders and the destruction
of our national infrastructures were certainly an
indelible national calamity that did not bring about
the desired national peace and stability we sought.
I hope we have learned a hard lesson.
. Nevertheless, we still have the chance to secure
the peace and stability we want in Liberia. We need
to reorganize and equip the Liberian military to become
a force for external defense and internal peace and
security. But the task of reorganizing the military
requires the collective effort and undivided attention
of all Liberians. I believe reorganization of the
Liberian military should be the “real election”
that each of us should cast our ballots for in October.
It was the uncontrollable “bum-bum” of
the guns that sent our fellow men and women to mass
graves. Our statesmen and women, our political leaders,
our religious leaders, our media executives, and our
legislature must ensure that our military is not only
reorganized but also that new recruits of the military
of the 4th Liberian republic must be our finest, sincerest,
nationalist, and patriotic sons and daughters. The
new Liberian military and military recruits must be
completely insulated against any concept or precept
of communal violence and unprofessional activities.
Early this year, during a symposium organized and hosted by LIHEDE on “Civil Liberties, Collective Security, and National Development in Post-Conflict Liberia,” Lt. Jonah Tarley - the gentlemen right here in the audience - presented a paper on reorganization of the Liberian Army, in which he called for the reinstitution of the county militias, a constitutional ban against military coups and mutinies in Liberia, among other topics. Lt. Tarley suggested the following as reflective of the heterogeneous structure of the Liberian society, and what the composition and role of the military should be in the new Liberian society.
· The principle of civil control over the
military must be paramount in a democracy [such as
the one Liberia is desiring to build].
· The selection rates for promotion should
be strictly controlled to the levels permitted by
the rank structure of the military, for example a
company of 150 Personnel will compose of one Captain,
2 Lieutenants etc.
· Measures should also be taken to maintain
the quality and morale of the [military] leaders at
the highest pitch.
· Every conceivable step should be taken to
ensure that military officers rise above their regional,
religious, and tribal origins and acquire a truly
Liberian personality. Thus only can the military succeed
as the laboratory for the national integration of
Liberia.
· Liberia needs to move toward a system of
military organization that combines a very small standing
military with a somewhat larger reserve force…In
colonial times, militaries were more likely to impose
the government's will on the people than to defend
the nation from external aggression. A reserve system
would also facilitate military downsizing.
· The Liberian Constitution should have zero
tolerance for forceful seizure of power. The military
usually suspend the Constitution after a take over.
One approach, therefore, could be to draft a section
[of the constitution] that emphasizes that the Constitution
is not suspendable.
· Further, we need to strengthen the language
of our 'anti-coup' clause with a Ghanaian type quotation.
In its 1992 constitution, Sec. 3 (4) declares that:
"All citizens of Ghana shall have the right and
duty at all times- (a) To defend this constitution,
and in particular to resist any person or group of
persons seeking to commit any of the acts referred
to in clause (3) of this article; and (b) To do all
in their power to restore this constitution after
it has been suspended, overthrown, or abrogated as
referred to in clause (3) of this article". The
constitution goes on in sub-section 5 to say: "Any
person or group of persons who suppresses or resists
the suspension, overthrow or abrogation of this constitution
as referred to in clause (3) of this article, commits
no offence" (LIHEDE Symposium Archives, 2005)
Distinguished ladies and gentlemen, I think Lt. Tarley
made a compelling case for reorganizing and strengthening
the Liberian military to promote internal peace and
stability in Liberia. But I think we could go a step
further. First I think we must appreciate that the
Liberian military has come a long way since 1839 when
the first militia forces - the forerunner of the Liberian
Frontier Force and the Armed Forces of Liberia - were
organized at the county and regional levels to protect
the territorial integrity of Liberia. Under Article
IX of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Liberia,
adopted on January 5, 1839 by the Board of Directors
of the American Colonization Society, the goals and
objectives of the Liberian militia were as follows:
1. The Governor and Council shall have power to provide
a uniform system of military tactics and discipline:
to provide for organizing, arming and disciplining
the militia, and for governing such part of them as
may be employed in the service of the Commonwealth:
2. To declare war in self-defence
3. To make rules concerning captures on land and water:
4. To make treaties with the several African tribes,
and to prescribe rules for regulating the commerce
between the Commonwealth of Liberia and such tribes;
except that all treaties for the acquisition of lands
shall be subject to the approval of the American Colonization
Society:
5. To prescribe uniform laws of naturalization for
all persons of color. All persons now citizens of
any part of the Commonwealth of Liberia shall continue
to be so, and all colored persons emigrating from
the United States of America, or any District or Territory
thereof, which the approbation, or under the sanction
of the American Colonization Society, or of any Society
auxiliary to the same, or of any State Colonization
Society of the United States, which shall have adopted
the Constitution of the American Colonization Society,
shall be entitled to all the privileges of citizens
of Liberia; except the same shall have been lost or
forfeited by conviction of some crime.
Of course, some of the functions of the militia forces,
as defined under the 1839 constitution, may be outdated
and may no longer be applicable to the modern Liberian
military. However, the general goals of the militia
forces in preparing at all times to promote internal
peace and security, and protect and defend the territorial
integrity of Liberia remained the same for the Liberian
military today. Some of the militia’s functions
have since been transferred to selected cabinet entities
and legislative bodies, but the coast guard and other
national security duties remained key functions of
the Liberian military. In fact, up to 1980, Liberia
still had militia forces that participated in public
parades every Armed Forces Day, although the Liberian
national militia was replaced by the Liberian Frontier
Force in 1908, and subsequently by the Armed Forces
of Liberia in the 1950s.
In “Liberia: A Country Study,” author
Harold Winson writes, “The organization of the
Hinterland and the effort to establish effective control
there through indirect rule had come as a direct response
to British and French intervention in the region.
Another product of Liberia's territorial disputes
with the two colonial powers was the formation of
the Liberian Frontier Force (LFF) in 1908. The mission
of the 500-man force was to patrol the border in the
Hinterland but, more important, it was organized to
prevent the sort of disorders that invited intervention.
The LFF was placed under the command of a British
officer, who recruited most of his troops in Sierra
Leone. The French initially regarded the LFF as a
"British army of occupation," but their
demand that French officers and colonial soldiers
be assigned to it as well was disregarded.”
Similarly, according to Global Security, “The
Liberian Frontier Force (LFF) later evolved into the
Armed Forces of Liberia (AFL). The Liberian Frontier
Force was the agency for tax collection and the enforcer
of government fiat. The idea for collecting taxes
was for the Americas to not get bogged down in the
dirty work of extracting forced labor. Therefore,
members of the Liberian Frontier Force were mainly
from the tribes, initially the northern tribes. First
there was a language barrier…” (http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/liberia/army.htm).
By the 1980s, the Armed Forces of Liberia boasted
of six infantry battalions, one engineering battalion,
one field artillery battalion, and one support battalion.
Of the six battalions, the First Infantry Battalion
at Camp Schieffelin and the Second Infantry Battalion
at Camp Todee, both in Montserrado County, along with
the Sixth Infantry Battalion at Tubmanburg, Bomi County
comprised the tactical or fighting forces intended
to deter outside aggression, while the Third Infantry
Battalion at BTC, Montserrado County, the Fourth Infantry
Battalion at Zwedru, Grand Gedeh County, and the Fifth
Infantry Battalion at Gbarnga, Bong County comprised
auxiliary personnel who usually performed extensive
police, customs, immigration, and tax collection duties.
Many Third Infantry Battalion personnel were also
used in the “Monrovia area to guard installations
or to serve as cooks, drivers, or aides to officers
and other officials” (http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/liberia/army.htm).
“The Support Battalion, also based at the BTC,
was composed of the Medical Company, the LNG Brigade
Band, the Brigade Special Unit (a parade formation),
and the Military Police,” Global Security said.
Before 1980, the Liberian military served in various
domestic roles such as tax collectors and security
guards. The ruthless manner by which the Liberian
Frontier Force collected the Hut Tax from rural Liberian
peasants or put down the Kru revolt in 1915 and the
Grebo revolt in 1910 are painful reminders of the
need to reorganize the Liberian military to play its
role as protectors of the Liberian homeland against
outside aggression and the enforcers of internal peace.
And I know the Liberian military is capable because
Henry Koboi Johnson proved that the Liberian military
was a capable fighting force during the Congo war
in the 1960s. But there is need for improvement. “In
1984 plans had been drawn up to standardize the tactical
units. It was proposed that the First, Second, and
Sixth Infantry battalions would all operate at a uniform
strength of 580 men (39 officers, two warrant officers,
and 539 enlisted men). These units were to be equipped
with trucks to facilitate their mobility, and each
was to be organically equipped with weapons and other
materiel to enable it to conduct sustained operations
as a mechanized infantry force” according to
Global Security.
While the tactical improvement of the Liberian military
took root in 1984, President Tolbert did take steps
to reform, if not to reorganize, the Liberian military
from a domestic errand corps of “inherent problems
of divided, uneducated, poorly trained” national
force to a sophisticated and equipped military force.
It was therefore no mistake that President Tolbert
wrote an official letter to the University of Liberia
and Cuttigton University College asking students at
those institutions to enlist in the Liberian army.
However, the universities had been radicalized so
the president’s vision to have educated sons
and daughters of Liberia to enlist in the Liberian
military fell on unfertile ground. Only few college
educated Liberians responded to the president’s
letter, but we can only imagine what the outcome would
have been.
Fellow countrymen and women, for nearly 14 years we
have been engaged in a war that threatens our people
with total destruction. During the upcoming elections
we need to pause for awhile and take stock of ourselves,
to consider our past, our successes notwithstanding,
to consider our future, our aspirations and our fears.
The destructiveness of the civil war ought to bring
our humanity to a spiritual crisis, borne out of the
physical nightmare each of us endured. Greed and hatred
finally reached such intensity that everyone became
weary of them. And the only alternative left to war
and human suffering is for us to stop hating and to
love, to stop wanting and to give, to stop dominating
and to serve. This is my message to you. This is the
hope that I have come with so that you and I will
move mountains. War teaches that even the man in the
street can rise to the greatest heights of sacrifice
for a selfless cause. War teaches that all the mundane
things of the world - wealth, power, fame, family
and even the very tenor of life on earth - are transitory
and devoid of lasting value.
Post-conflict Liberia deserves a military whose codes
of professional military conduct would dictate that
promotions be determined by ability, expertise, and
education. The military, for instance, needs to believe
that civilian leaders are selected by legitimate means
and that the leaders are fair, competent, and honest.
The military needs to be respected, its counsel adequately
considered on strategic issues affecting the Liberian
nation. The military needs to enjoy its autonomy on
matters that are strictly internal to the military,
and the military must believe that civilian leaders
and society at large will see service in the military
as an honorable profession. The military budget must
be fair and proportionate to other national security
agencies’ budgets, and military service must
be adequately rewarded without favor. Members of the
Liberian military must as well see their service and
allegiance as holistic to Liberia rather than to specific
regions, tribes, groups, or individuals.
The military must understand that international businesses
prefer civilian rule to military rule, and for purposes
of promoting investments in Liberia, the Liberian
military personnel must avoid coup d’etats,
limit active involvement in politics, and refrain
from other activities that may be incompatible with
military professionalism or may detract from the promotion
of national security. Similarly, civilian officials
must believe that military leaders are competent,
honest, and effective, and that they deserve autonomy
or authority over certain internal issues. Civilians
must believe that politicization of the military would
detract from national security and political stability
even though it might bring short-term gains to civilian
leaders who manipulate the military. As Lt. Tarley
noted in his presentation at the LIHEDE symposium,
"Military intervention into civilian affairs
is usually not by military groups. In most cases,
civilians turn to the military for political support
when civilian political structures and institutions
fail, when factionalism develops and constitutional
means for the conduct of political action are lacking.
The civilians, therefore, begin to indoctrinate the
military with their political ideologies.” This
passage is so true that the entire Liberian society
needs to share these beliefs, and should feel that
the military represents the nation as a whole rather
than one region or segment.
It is always an exceeding joy to connect with one’s
birth land, a land beneath which the ancestral fossils
and umbilical cord are buried for eternity. The memory
of Liberia, a land that has given me so much of nurturing,
a land so enchanting, so fascinating, is always alive
in my life no matter where I go and no matter what
I do. This land, with its rainforest, jungle rhythms,
oceanic tranquility, sea and rivers is my Jordan River.
I do not want to see any more civil wars in Liberia,
nor do I want to see Liberia at war with its neighbors.
I do not want to see a Liberian military that doubles
as tax collectors, prison guards, security guards,
police officers, cooks, drivers, or immigration officers.
I want to see the engineering battalion of the Liberian
military building bridges and roads. I want to see
the Liberian military away from the public centers
into their assigned barracks undergoing basic and
advanced military training. I want to see a reorganized
military that will win the respect of the Liberian
people.
Along these lines, ladies and gentlemen, I want to
join Lt, Tarley in making the following recommendations
toward the reorganization of the Liberian military:
· Re-establish a militia force nation-wide
in each county to serve as first line of defense against
outside invaders.
· Establish special schools for children of
military personnel.
· The AFL should not be more than 10% of the
national population (3 million) and should be ethnically
balanced. Such a figure would ensure adequate care
and other incentives for our men and women in arms
and their families.
· All enlisted personnel must be at least high
school graduate beginning the next five to ten years.
· All generals, brigadiers; and other military
officers must be first degree holders in military
science beginning the next 10 to 15 years.
· Free or subsidized housing and life and retirement
benefits should be given to every qualified Liberian
military personnel.
· Reorganize the military and hold peace seminars
(military for peace program) to be delivered by the
military personnel throughout Liberia and via radio.
· Reorganize the military and help all personnel
to acquire applied skills as electricians, carpenters,
masons, agriculturists, classroom teachers, mechanics,
environmentalists, or farmers in order to foster national
development.
Ladies and gentlemen,. we all must work harder to
make our nation stronger by bringing the government
and the military closer to the Liberian people. We
must make every national development plan transparent
to the Liberian people, beginning with reorganization
of the military for internal peace and external security.
Thank you.