The Way Forward In The Job Market
By Leon Ledlum
The Perspective
Atlanta, Georgia
January 23, 2004
We have over the years concentrated on political issues,
with very little attention on the economy of our nation. We all know
why that has been the case, and I, therefore, would not attempt to justify
or criticize it.
My attempt with this piece, is to bring to the open, my view as it relates
to Liberians' direct efforts in helping with the reconstruction of our
beloved nation. No people can build a prosperous nation without the
nationals' maximum participation, and this has been one of the reasons
why our country stands as it is today. The time has now come for us
to grab the opportunity that is out there, no matter how little it may
appear.
Liberia of today needs the input of every meaningful citizen for our
reconstruction, both physically and psychologically. The role of reconstructing
our psychic is more paramount than the physical, hence no one should
down play it. When one's psychic is balanced, he/she has better control
of his/her physical environment.
I have read others' opinions on our economic future, and have suggested
in their views' what they see would better place Liberia and its people.
Let me quickly remind the readers that I am no authority on economics,
but would like to add my own suggestion, as I am also a Liberian citizen,
and know what plagues us as a people.
Looking at what has happened to Liberia to date, it is easy to say the
underlying interest of all parties in all the conflicts is MONEY, or
better put, wealth. And mistakenly, Liberians have come to equate political
power to wealth making. This trend can be brought to an end should the
GOL adopt appropriate policies towards empowering its citizenry economically,
by way of creating softer financial institutions that would lend investment
capital to Liberians who have the know-how, and will power to establish
businesses.
My advice would be that such loans for investments should be doled out
in bits towards purchasing what would be required for such enterprise,
and their payrolls be paid out by such lending institutions, rather
than the usual cash pay out to the owners of such projects, as was the
case in earlier GOL sponsored programs.
It is now the appropriate era to be innovative with the Liberian economy.
Many Liberians are anxious for work or jobs, but a good number of them
want to be self-employed and creating jobs for others. Their main obstacle
in achieving that objective is the initial capital for a take off. The
GOL has the political responsibility to solving this problem, and it
serves as a down payment for future sources of revenue, through tax
collections and other GOL fees. The more affluent Liberians become,
the more prosperous and stable the nation stands.
The Lebanese and Indian factor, which the late Doe use to call "
Partners in Progress", need to be looked at seriously and to quantify
and qualify that relationship with the purpose of making it more beneficial
to the Liberian citizenry and not the other way around. I strongly feel
the presence of this dominating our economy need to be brought to a
screeching halt. Liberia cannot continue to be their sphere of influence
to the Liberian detriment.
The need to adopt certain stringent policies to protect the Liberian
economy for the benefit of Liberians cannot be over emphasized. Many
Liberians would take up many of these so-called investments in the absence
of these "Partners in Progress", were they not protected by
our politicians.
Example of why many Liberians fail in business can be attributed to
unfair competition with their so called "Partners in Progress"
who control the wholesale market, and therefore, have lines of credit
opened to their compatriots who also dominate the retail sector of the
economy, while the Liberians must pay cash/credit at a higher buying
price. How can the Liberians fairly compete?
One way to entice Liberians into the commerce sector, (especially retail)
would be to limit foreign participation at that level to be partnership
with Liberians, while their participation on the wholesale level should
be open to all.
For Liberians to nurture their newly found hope and peace, there is
the need for GOL to put at the disposal of its citizenry the minimal
inputs for a forward move. This, I believe, would go a long way to minimize
the people's attention on politics and hasten the pace towards healing
our nation, and reconciling our differences.