HIV/AIDS in Africa: South Africa’s Leadership is Crucial
The recent announcement that South Africa’s government will roll out
a comprehensive anti-retroviral treatment program by the end of September
2003 is a major step in the right direction for the estimated 5 million South
Africans living with HIV/AIDS. It is also a giant step forward for the more
than half-a-million South Africans that need immediate access to antiretroviral
therapy. A comprehensive and effective treatment plan for South Africa is
also welcome news to South African families that dread the death of a loved
one from AIDS: Every day, at least 600 South Africans die of AIDS associated
illnesses.
That the first ever National AIDS conference only took place in August 2003
in a country with the highest known case load of HIV/AIDS is a testament to
the titanic struggle between the government and civil society organizations
in South Africa on the best way forward on HIV/AIDS, the Achilles heel of
the country’s otherwise rosy economic future. Various reports from the
National AIDS conference suggest that South Africa is now entering the “death”
phase of the epidemic, with devastating implications for the national economy,
work force, and the powerful private sector. One of the reports by the Human
Sciences Research Council of South Africa (HRSC) indicated that in a recent
survey, 16 percent of 2000 surveyed health workers were HIV positive, with
at least 20 percent of those aged 20 to 35, living with the virus.
Although South Africans will benefit immediately from their government’s
decision on access to AIDS treatment, the widest implication for the new AIDS
policy in South Africa will be the continent of Africa. As the economic juggernaut
of Africa, a pre-eminent military power, and an oasis of reasonable democratic
traditions, South Africa is a giant in the continent. Today in Africa, South
Africa and Nigeria are without exception, the two most powerful and influential
nations in Africa. A lot is expected of South Africa as Nigeria grapples with
its myriad of problems. For Africa to tackle its number one development emergency,
HIV/AIDS, South Africa must not only be on board, but also provide vigorous
leadership.
A popular question is why South Africa becomes gun shy when it comes to a
vigorous response against HIV/AIDS. Many analysts have noted the influential
role South Africa played in the transformation of the increasingly ineffectual
Organization of African Unity into a promising African Union. South Africa’s
role as the gentle but firm guiding hand in the formulation of the Africa’s
recovery plan, NEPAD, is well known. The proposed AIDS comprehensive treatment
program may be seen as an attempt by South Africa to reassert its leadership
role in the continent.
However, as with other policy announcements in Africa, the devil is in the
details, and, saints can only be crowned with evidence of vigorous implementation
and sustainability of laudable programs, even for a known and deadly killer
such AIDS. South Africa must not only roll out an effective treatment program
but it must also expand such services at an accelerated rate to reach those
that are clinically qualified for treatment. The current estimate is that
out of 500,000 South Africans that can benefit from antiretroviral therapy,
only 21,000 are on lifesaving therapy. Medical charities serve more than 95
percent of all those on antiretroviral therapy in South Africa. South Africa,
in addition to a comprehensive treatment program, must improve its information,
education and information (IEC) campaigns against HIV infection. This will
require regular IEC messages on HIV prevention from President Thabo Mbeki.
At the continental level, South Africa should ensure that the African Union
and NEPAD not only talk about HIV/AIDS but also devote substantial resources
in a continent-wide fight against the disease. If Africa should have a home
grown economic recovery plan, why should it not have an African-oriented AIDS
remedial effort? An effective African oriented AIDS remedial effort would
go beyond conference declarations and resolutions to specific issues such
as cross sharing of expertise and resources across borders, strategic priorities
on resource sourcing and mobilization, and the role of Africans in the Diaspora.
South Africa’s continental leadership role is also crucial in current
efforts to allow poor nations obtain cheaper versions of AIDS drugs using
the mandates of the World Trade Organization. In addition, South Africa’s
flourishing research institutions have a lot to offer to many African nations
that are still developing their capacities for quality scientific research.
South Africa, with its well-developed private sector and a sophisticated civil
society is also in a position to offer continental leadership on an effective
tripartite approach-public, private, civil society-to AIDS remedial efforts.
In the area of governance, now emerging as a major handicap in AIDS remedial
efforts in Africa, democratic traditions and institutions in South Africa,
despite occasional hiccoughs, appear robust and stable, and could provide
pointers to other African countries.
I look forward to South Africa’s robust leadership on AIDS remedial
efforts in Africa. As a member of the Constituency for Africa’s delegation
to NEPAD and South Africa in early 2003, I observed first hand the no-nonsense
approach to leadership by South Africa’s leaders. During the delegation’s
lengthy audience with the Deputy President of South Africa, Jacob Zuma, he
spoke eloquently on how HIV/AIDS had become a major problem for his country.
Now, it appears that the government of South Africa is ready to lead its people
out of mortal danger from AIDS.
A strong resolve and necessary action against HIV/AIDS in South Africa will
not only affect its citizens but will also have far reaching implications
for the continent of Africa. The Economic Commission of Africa in its latest
report on Africa estimate that HIV/AIDS, on the average, reduces Africa’s
GDP growth by 0.5-2.6 percent a year, dealing mortal blows to the expected
annual 7 percent GDP needed by Africa to meet the 2015 UN Millennium Development
Goals. South Africa, as the economic engine room of Africa and as one of the
“big two” politically in Africa (Nigeria is the other country)
cannot afford to be missing in action in the fight against the gravest threat
to Africa’s renaissance.