Liberia’s Interim Leader put in power to shield warlords?
By Gabriel Williams
The Perspective
Atlanta, Georgia
October 18, 2003
Since Liberia’s brutal dictator and indicted war criminal Charles Taylor
was forced to relinquish power and leave the country in August, hopes are
rekindled that Liberia now has an opportunity to end 14 years of death and
destruction and begin the process of reconstruction.
The deployment of what is to become the largest United Nations peacekeeping
force in the world, which is supposed to reach full strength of 15,000 plus
a few thousand police and other personnel, is a saving grace for the people
of Liberia - for which the United Nations and the Economic Community of West
African States regional body must be commended very highly.
Even though it took the international community over a decade to recognize
the humanitarian catastrophe that unfolded in Liberia and spread into neighboring
countries at the cost of nearly half a million lives, it has been recognized
that a miserably failed state like Liberia is a breeding ground for terrorism
and regional destabilization. The mandate of the recent United States-sponsored
UN Security Council resolution authorizing the peacekeeping force and a more
active UN involvement in Liberia’s affairs, underscored the international
community’s recognition that Liberia must be rescued from the state
of anarchy, if there will be lasting peace and progress in West Africa.
The Liberia restoration process include getting rid of the evil regime of
warlord-turned president Charles Taylor, disarming and demobilizing all armed
factions involved in the years of bloody power struggle with Taylor, and creating
the enabling environment for peace, democratic governance and progress.
With indicted war criminal Taylor exiled to Nigeria awaiting his day in court,
while the UN peacekeeping force is being deployed to take full control of
security in the country, an interim Liberian government was inducted October
14 to serve for two years.
The power-sharing interim government is part of the peace agreement signed
in Ghana by the various Liberian armed factions, aimed at ending 14 years
of bloody contest for power. Charles Gyude Bryant, a businessman and so-called
neutral person, was picked by the armed factions to head the interim government.
Bryant, a relatively unknown individual outside the Episcopal Church of Liberia
where he is a prominent lay leader, was selected by the warlords because of
his stated position that he would not support the prosecution of thugs and
murderous criminals who have slaughtered hundreds of thousands of people and
looted the country beyond description.
Addressing the media one day following his induction, Chairman Bryant said
he did not support the idea of setting up of a truth and reconciliation commission
to investigate the human rights abuses carried out by the armed gangs, arguing
that it would do nothing to heal the wounds from the 14 years of death and
destruction.
Chairman Bryant’s opposition to the setting up of a war crimes court
or a truth commission could very well be a fulfillment of his side of the
bargain with the armed gangs that he would shield them if they picked him
over individuals widely seen to be more qualified candidates, who voiced support
for a war crimes court or truth commission.
More so, his comments are absolute rubbish and an insult to the Liberian people,
particularly the hundreds of thousands of innocents who lost their lives in
the senseless bloody contest for power.
This is not about retribution, but rather instituting a due process of law
to bring about accountability, in order to end the culture of impunity that
have enabled criminals to thrive while perpetrating atrocities and other acts
of human rights abuses and looting public resources to enrich themselves.
Is Bryant saying that the United Nations was out for retribution when it partnered
with the government of Sierra Leone in setting up the war crimes court that
indicted Taylor and Sierra Leonean rebel leaders accused of bearing the greatest
responsibility for the war that cost the death of an estimated 50,000 people
and the amputation of the limbs of thousands of Sierra Leoneans?
Despite several articles that have been written criticizing how Bryant was
selected to head the interim government, I had taken an attitude of wait and
see, relative to how his pronouncements and activities would be upon taking
office. But if Bryant’s first day in office is any indication of things
to come, I’m afraid that Liberia may be headed for continued chaos and
bloodbath. After challenging the wisdom of a war crimes court and truth commission,
the man went on to announce advisors that are mostly from Taylor’s murderous
regime.
Let’s not forget that less than three months ago, Taylor presided over
what is now recorded in history as the fourth most brutal regime in the world,
which was accused of collaboration with Osama bin Laden’s terrorist
network and destabilization of all of the countries neighboring Liberia in
order to plunder resources. Yet one of Bryant’s official acts on his
first day in office was to announce that he was surrounding himself with advisors
who included Taylor’s Minister of National Security, Director General
of the Cabinet, and an ambassador at large who was responsible to help improve
the brutal despot’s image abroad. These are men who have yet to give
any account of their activities in one of the most brutal and barbaric regimes
in the world.
I herewith call on Chairman Bryant to reverse his appointment of those advisors
and other officials that were part of Taylor’s murderous regime or who
are associated with the armed gangs. Since the criminal gangs already control
majority of the positions in the transitional government, Bryant’s appointments
should focus on experience, integrity, democratic commitment and respect for
human rights as criteria. Liberia is endowed with abundant human resources,
and there are thousands of qualified reputable Liberians whose expertise must
be tapped. We must get away from the business of rewarding criminal, corrupt
and incompetent elements with positions in government, if we are to discourage
the practice that encourages people taking up arms to seize political power
and wealth.
My optimism regarding recent positive developments in Liberia since Taylor’s
departure from power has been tempered by fear that the Bryant-led government,
dominated by criminals and those hustling for quick bucks, could add to the
list of failed interim governments that eventually plunged the country back
into war.
My fear is against the fact that the armed factions, including remnants of
Taylor’s regime and the two rebel groups opposed to the now fallen regime
- Liberian United for Reconciliation and Democracy (LURD) and the Movement
for Democracy in Liberia (MODEL) – control 72 percent of positions in
the government, including key ministries like Foreign Affairs, Finance, Justice,
National Defense, Internal Affairs, Commerce, and Lands, Mines and Energy,
as well as major public corporations including the Liberia Petroleum Refining
Company. For the recent slaughter of thousands of defenseless people, the
murderous criminals have been rewarded control over agencies that are the
lifeblood of our country.
We should brace ourselves for a continuation of the rule of the jungle and
plunder of resources, if there is no strong United Nations oversight. We have
been down this road in the past with several interim governments dominated
by warlords and headed by so-called "neutralists" to appease the
armed gangs as a bargain for peace. Rather than the peace war-weary Liberians
long desired, the country remained increasingly chaotic as the warlords did
not hesitate to continue waging war to defend their turfs.
The armed gangs also have 36 seats in the 76-seat transitional legislature,
and there are reports that a known notorious murderer representing one of
the factions is positioning himself to be the speaker of the legislature.
Taylor’s puppet remains Chief Justice of the very dysfunctional judiciary.
There are reports of literally a stampede for government jobs that are being
handed out to loyalists and the highest bidders, not necessarily on the basis
of qualifications or individual integrity. Many individuals abroad who provided
financial and other support to the various armed gangs have reportedly packed
their bags and are rushing back to Liberia to claim their share of the bounty.
Those are some of the very people who drained Liberia and made vassals of
their fellow countrymen.
All things considered, a strong United Nations involvement in the affairs
of the country is the only hope the Liberian people have in getting rid of
those murderous criminals and their supporting casts. What we have in Liberia
is a government that is nothing more than a realignment of the criminal gangs
that have plundered the country for the past 14 years, in collaboration with
political prostitutes who have ended up in bed with every government that
come along. If past experiences provide any lessons, we should expect nothing
better from rebels who have threatened to destroy our commonwealth. Rebels
are rebels, who have demonstrated reckless disregard for human life and the
rule of law, and their destructive activities must be ended. In the fullness
of time, our past and present factional leaders will join Taylor as indicted
war criminals.
Liberia is lucky to have UN Special Envoy Jacques Klein and U.S. Ambassador
John Blaney serving in the country at this time. With the presence of such
strong international representatives, the Liberian people are hopeful that
their nightmare would be over, and the activities of criminals masquerading
as Liberian government officials will soon be ended. I particularly salute
Klien for taking relevant actions to stabilize the country and create the
enabling conditions to bring about lasting peace to Liberia.
There is a very serious need for the United Nations to set up a war crimes
court to prosecute all those culpable of war crimes and crimes against humanity
during the Liberian civil war. The need to also set up a truth commission
cannot be overemphasized.
It must be made absolutely clear to Mr. Bryant that the Liberian people do
not need his blessing for the setting up of a war crimes court or truth commission.
There are many reasons why some people may be opposed to creating any medium
to establish accountability for the crimes that have been committed in Liberia.
There are many prominent Liberians, while publicly pretending to be neutrals,
who have been closet supporters of the armed factions for political and financial
gains, for which they are rewarded.
As I conclude this article, I’m not unaware that there are those who
might feel that we are over reacting or unnecessarily attacking a government
that has been in office just for several days. I remember people reacting
similarly or attacking me as anti-government or a detractor when I published
an open letter in the media drawing attention to certain ills in the government
immediately after Taylor came to power in late 1997, which I felt would plunge
Liberia back into war if not corrected. It was my considered opinion, as it
is today, that after years of bloodshed and destruction due to bad governance,
we would continue to experience chaos if we don’t change the way things
have been done and begin to create the conditions for good governance. In
a rebuttal article in the London-based New African magazine and a Voice of
America interview, the then Minister of Information called me one of the self-imposed
exile detractors who was spreading false news to discredit Taylor’s
government. A fellow Liberian who had seen my open letter met me at a gathering
and exploded in public, angrily saying how dare you people continue to sit
in America eating hamburger while undermining the government that is trying
to meet the needs of war-ravished Liberians by spreading falsehood. Those
of us who took up the challenge to expose Taylor’s murderous regime
came under increasing fire from its supporters and apologists.
Today, there can be no question that we were right on the mark in exposing
the excesses of Taylor, now an indicted war criminal. We share an equal responsibility
to keep Chairman Bryant’s government under scrutiny. At this crucial
time in our country, we will not hesitate to draw attention to any ills of
the interim government, notwithstanding the fact that Bryant and I are fellow
Episcopalians and members of the same parish, Trinity Cathedral in Monrovia,
where I was also an active lay member playing organizational leadership roles
including editor of the Cathedral’s magazine before fleeing Liberia.
And this is not about impugning Bryant’s integrity, either. Judging
from his selfless and dedicated services to the church, I know that he is
an honorable and hardworking person. But services in the church or other areas
can prove to be different from public service, let alone serving in the Liberian
government. The Liberian political culture is so very dangerously corrupt
and intoxicating that most well-intentioned people often turn out to be miserable
failures or compromised once in power. The past decade of war and plunder
have enabled Liberians to see the true colors of people who we taught truly
had the interest of the people at heart and were expected to institute meaningful
change once in power. Most of them turned out to be incapable custodians of
the public trust, and they became nothing more than pariahs and vultures on
the Liberian people.
Bryant deserves commendation for making some laudable pronouncements aimed
at fostering the peace process, and taking actions like eliminating monopoly
over the importation of certain commodities, including rice and petroleum.
However, Chairman Bryant can rest assured that we will keep his feet to the
fire to ensure that he does not betray the will of the Liberian people by
instituting policies that mostly serve the interest of armed criminals who
put him in power. Like in Sierra Leone, the murderous criminals in Liberia
must be brought to book if we will end the state of death and destruction
to control political power and plunder resources. Indications are that the
bloody game is over.